Medieval Forests

I grew up not far from the New Forest in Hampshire and spent a lot of time there as a child and teenager. It wasn’t until decades later that I started to wonder why it had so few trees. Although there are (modern) plantations out there, most of the forest is heathland, with occasional bits of bog. It was a long time before I realised that a forest isn’t just a big wood; it’s something else entirely.

In the Middle Ages a forest was an area that was legally defined as a forest, set aside for the king’s enjoyment, mainly hunting. There didn’t have to be a single tree there for it to be made a forest. This was known as afforestation. It was particularly common under the Normans and early Plantagenet kings, who loved to hunt. If they thought that a particular area looked as if it might provide good hunting, they could just turn it into a forest. The New Forest was one of the first, created in 1079 by William the Conqueror.

No one was allowed to hunt in the forests but the king and anyone he invited to hunt with him. Henry II was particularly vicious in the punishments meted out to poachers or others who encroached in any way on his rights in the forests. Some of them were executed, but castration and blinding were common punishments. By this point the royal forests covered almost a third of England.

They were governed by Forest Laws, quite separate from the laws covering the rest of the kingdom, and managed by foresters and agistors. Forest Law was a French concept brought across the Channel by William the Conqueror. The forests had their own courts and judges. Most of the cases covered poaching, but there were other problems. Forests were not popular with the king’s landholding subjects.  The country was short of arable land. Although the population was small, it was hard to grow enough to feed it, partly because yields were low, sometimes only twice as much seed was produced as had been planted. Since the forests were vast (all of Essex was once part of a royal forest) many manors were included within them, usually held my lords who would rather be making ‘better’ use of the land than providing entertainment for the king and his friends. Sometimes thy might try to ‘salvage’ a bit of land from the forests. Animals such as cows and pigs could be kept in the forests, but they had to be moved when the king wanted to hunt or at certain points in the year when he didn’t want his prey to be disturbed. Sometimes the animals were in the wrong place and that could result in a visit to the forest court.

Forest Law specified the hunting season for some animals. It also clarified some of the many things that couldn’t be done in the forest, such as felling timber, clearing woodland and killing the animals to be hunted.

In 1217 an attempt was made to reduce the punishment for not observing the Forest Laws. This was the Charter of the Forest. It didn’t last long, as Henry III restored the right to mutilate and castrate ten years later.

Forests could be disafforested on payment of a fine to the king. This happened mostly during the reigns of Richard I and John, who were perennially short of money. When a part of the forest was released on payment of a fine it became known as a chase and this was the private hunting ground of the person or group of people who had paid the fine.

Hunting in the royal forests didn’t end well for all of England’s medieval kings. William II (Rufus) went out into the New Forest one day in 1100 and was shot dead by Sir Walter Tirel. It was never established whether it was accident or assassination, but Sir Walter was known for being very accurate with a bow and William’s brother Henry was in the party. A few days later Henry was proclaimed king. The event is commemorated by the monument in the picture at the top of the post: Rufus Stone.

Sources:
England in the Reign of Edward III by Scott L. Waugh
Making a Living in the Middle Ages by Christopher Dyer
A Dictionary of Medieval Terms and Phrases by Christopher Corédon and Ann Williams
A Social History of England 1200 – 1500 ed Rosemary Horrox and W. Mark Ormrod

April Munday is the author of the Soldiers of Fortune and Regency Spies series of novels, as well as standalone novels set in the fourteenth century.

Available now:

Amazon

27 Comments

Filed under Medieval Hunting, Medieval Life

27 responses to “Medieval Forests

  1. Lovely article, April. I have fond memories of the New Forest, used to live near Ashdown and currently not far from Bowland. I didn’t know that’s how chases came about. I do recall that several settlements were destroyed in the New Forest to suit William I. Interesting stuff about the forest laws!

    Liked by 3 people

  2. Questo articolo è favoloso! Non sapevo nulla di questo… and then I learnt POACHING and TIMBER. Anyway, what’s the meaning of AGISTOR? I couldn’t find the translation in the dictionary. Have a wonderful Sunday, April!

    Liked by 2 people

  3. And if I remember correctly Henry legged it to claim the treasury at top speed, leaving his dying brother probably dangling from his horse. I was surprised the first time I saw this very humble grave monument to an English king–especially the first son of a conqueror who had no qualms personally or culturally about dotting the landscape with prominent reminders of his familial presence, power and dominance.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. That answered my musing on why New Forest was so – treeless. Had read that Royal Foresters we’re sometimes sent to cull game for the King’s table, or to remove unwanted animals such as the occasional proliferation of hares. This must have been carefully regulated. I’m not sure if I would want to be a Royal Forester. Temptation must have been strong to poach from the King’s table. 🤫🌹

    Liked by 1 person

    • They did have to cull game and they still do. Deer have no natural predators since wolves were wiped out in England in the fourteenth century. All the fourteenth-century deer didn’t end up on the king’s table; he gave a lot of it away to friends.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Does game still make it to the Queen’s table?

        Hunting rights in the USA are jealousy guarded by so-called sportsmen.

        Must have been a knee-jerk reaction to English and other
        European hunting rules colonists hated.

        The result is too many firearms here in the wrong hands. 😠

        Liked by 1 person

        • Game still makes it to the tables of all kinds of people, from every walk of life. It’s regulated and there are lots of licences involved if you want to go and shoot it yourelf. If I ate meat, I could by some venison fairly locally.

          Liked by 1 person

  5. Cool post April, I didn’t know about forests not needing trees!

    Liked by 3 people

  6. Hw interesting . I had no idea . Thanks .

    Liked by 2 people

  7. A fascinating post about the “treeless” medieval forests. Thanks, April!

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Pingback: Medieval Woods | A Writer's Perspective

  9. I haven’t anything more to add, April, just to say I joined reading the post. It was fascinating.

    Liked by 2 people

Please join the conversation

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s