Embroidery was something that every woman brought up in a wealthy household could do. They sewed purses for their husbands, or table linen or cushions for the household. If they were really accomplished, they might make something for the local church. I think all the women in my novels do embroidery at some point.
Nuns also embroidered. Some of them could get so carried away with it that they were told to return to their books and the singing of psalms.
Embroidery was not just a domestic skill, however, it was also a profession. In the domestic setting, embroidery was done by women. Professionally, it was mainly done by women, but some men were also involved. It looks as if all the designing was done by men.
For 200 years, from around 1150 to about 1350, England led Europe in embroidery skills and designs. This was the peak of the opus anglicanum ((English work)) style of embroidery and it was in great demand, both in England and abroad. This changed until, around 1400, the quality had disappeared and Flemish and Italian designers and embroiders were pre-eminent.
There are no records of guilds of embroiders at this time, but they, or something like them, must have existed in order to maintain the quality of the work. Whether or not they did exist, there were still some rules that the professionals had to follow. Like the fletchers and bowyers we met a couple of weeks ago, they were not allowed to work by candlelight.
Leading embroiderers worked directly for kings, nobles, bishops and abbots, embroidering clothing, vestments and decorative pieces. Embroidery was not something that could be rushed, not if you were to produce something of quality. During the reign of Edward I, it took four women three and three-quarter years to make the altar frontal for the main altar in Westminster Abbey.
Large objects, such as copes, chasubles, altar-cloths, mantles, and bed and wall hangings were made in workshops by a team of embroiders. Smaller ones, such as bands, mitres, cushions and purses could be made by an embroideress in her own home.
The best embroideries were done with silk thread, and silver and gold thread, the making of which was a skill in itself. Those who could make it were paid more than embroiders. They spun narrow strips of gold or silver around a silk thread. The thread was extremely expensive, so it was attached to the cloth by couching, allowing all of it to be on display. Couching was a technique in which the gold thread was placed on the fabric in the desired shape and held in place by small stitches in silk thread along its length. This is a technique I’ve tried and it’s not easy.
The other main type of stitch used was the split stitch. It’s exactly what you think it is: the needle splits the thread as it comes from the back to the front of the fabric. I’ve only ever done this by accident.
After the Reformation, many church vestments were destroyed so that the precious metals and jewels could be recovered. Very little medieval embroidery has survived and even the Bayeux Tapestry was almost ripped up on several occasions.
Here is a very short video showing the process used in the Middle Ages to create a piece of embroidery.
Sources:
Medieval Craftsmen: Embroiderers by Kay Staniland
April Munday is the author of the Soldiers of Fortune and Regency Spies series of novels, as well as standalone novels set in the fourteenth century.
Available now:
I love embroidery, April, and have done many pieces. For what seems a simple task, doing it well takes skill. If you are wise you only approach the task when you are calm and have good light. Great post.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, Jo. I’m trying to branch out after being a cross stitcher for over 30 years.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, calm and a good light (and a decent pair of eyes!)
That was a fascinating video!
LikeLiked by 1 person
The videos great, isn’t it? These days my eyes need a bit of assistance when I’m doing needlework.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love embroidery, and regularly fall down worm hole on Pinterest, some of the examples there are stunning, and it’s good to see that old skills are not lost.
Having tried spinning, how anyone spun gold thread is beyond me, I can understand why it was so prized. It’s also fragile and prone to breaking so couching, difficult as it is, protects the thread from wear & tear. All several grades above my scale though.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I don’t think anyone’s quite sure these days how it was done. Ruth Goodman and her daughter had a go in Secrets of the Castle, but what they eventually managed to make was quite coarse and difficult to use. They more or less wound thin strips of gold leaf around some thread.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m not at all surprised. Spinning in itself is so technical. Wool is not so bad, because it’s thick and course anyway, but to get an even fine silk thread would take such skill. But adding gold? That is just a ridiculous level of expertise.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The video is amazing, my Mum was very good at embroidery but I don’t have anything she did sadly. Interesting post thanks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The video is impressive. You can see how long it would take to make even something tiny.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great post for the times April. Might be a good time to consider embroidery. A few artists I know use embroidery in their work. And I recently read a line from Joan Didion comparing something to ‘petit point on Kleenex’, a powerful metaphor for…something.
I wonder why the English quality fell?Was it linked to some historical events?
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s keeping me occupied at the moment.
There’s a suggestion that the quality fell because there was more work than the embroiderers could cope with and they started cutting corners. I don’t really know what happened.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was wondering if migration had anything to do with it?All the skilled people leaving?But they wouldve been coming the other way wouldnt they?Interesting. Look forward to hearing what you find.
LikeLiked by 1 person
In the SCA, the Medieval reenactment society I’m in, embroidery is extremely popular among the women and also some men. I took a class on 5 Medieval stitches, one of which was the couch stitch, which I didn’t find all that difficult. My favorite stitch is herringbone and its many varients. Thanks for the post, April!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, Timi. I use a herringbone stitch if I’m hemming something by hand.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I did a double herringbone stitch for the silk panel on my smokkr, or apron dress, that I made for a Coronation celebration a couple of years ago. Sever arthritis in my hands and fingers has really cut back on my ability to hand-sew much of anything, though. So I’m glad I did it while I could! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love to embroider and is one of the few skills I picked up fairly easy/effortlessly – that said, didn’t ever transfer those skills to cross stitch or free hand tapestry/ribbon work, but, well, if ever I get to ‘retire’ can’t wait to learn how to take a blank piece of cloth and just stitch/fill without transferring on the ‘outline’ first, for the ‘work’ – LOL – Thanks for sharing this info! Wonder how much the bad wave of Black Death in …what was it? 1348? had to do the dying out of ‘being the lead’ on embroidery? Seems like that wave hit England hard, and folks were scrambling just to keep fed/get work done in face of reduced workforce –
LikeLiked by 2 people
I wondered if the Black Death might have been a factor, but it was just as bad in Italy and Flanders. I suppose, as with most things, it was a combination of events and influences.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love embroidery! Super cool to learn about the medieval practices. I received an embroidery kit as a child and taught myself every stitch in the book for the fun of it that summer. My favorite were the couch stitch and satin stitch because they both prioritize showing off the thread in a grandiose way. (I can see why they would have wanted to preserve gold that way!) The split stitch is incredibly elegant, though, I must say!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m trying to learn satin stitch, because I’ve got to go back and fill in some of the spaces on my sampler. I’ve learned queen stitch and quite like it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Such a relaxing video. I’ve never tried embroidery, but would like to. I have a few crotchet projects on the go at the moment, but maybe in the future I’ll have a go. I didn’t know that very few medieval embroideries have survived, how sad.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is sad. I found some pictures online of some purses and they’re lovely.
I’m glad you found the video relaxing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Medieval Embroiderers ~ April Munday | Sue Vincent's Daily Echo
I really enjoyed reading this. It’s interesting you mention the Flemish as I have a vague recollection of Edward IV (I think) bringing Flemish weavers over to England to share their skills for weaving and working with wool. I tend to forget what an valuable historical source fabric and its fashions can be.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. Flemish weavers were in England well before Edward IV and were a target of the Peasants’ Revolt in 1381. He might have been instrumental in bringing them back, I’m afraid I don’t know much about the fifteenth century. Wool is a fascinating subject in itself. At the same time as England was producing the best embroidered in Europe, it was also producing the best wool.
LikeLike
During the fifteenth century the European wool trade overtook the English if I’m remembering correctly. It’s been a few years since I studied it and I’ve not had much cause to research it in recently years. My own blog focuses more on creative writing and poems so since my degree I haven’t written anything academic. Though maybe I should get back into it.
There were also issues throughout the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries with English currency being devalued. (Coin clipping). The wars of the roses depleted the treasury and Edward IV sought to rebalance the English books so to speak by encouraging the export of goods. If have to go back to my books to give a more detailed description than that however. Do you have a post on the 1381 revolt?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have a bit of a mental block where the Wars of the Roses are concerned, and should probably do a bit of reading about them. There isn’t a post on the revolt yet, but I’m doing a lot of reading about that end of the fourteenth century at the moment, so there’s bound to be one or more at some point.
LikeLike
I found mention of the revolt at the end of one of my book, however the author spins is as an ‘almost revolution’. I feel that might be a bit strong.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They did kill the Archbishop of Canterbury, which feels pretty revolutionary to me.
LikeLike
It was certainly unique in its anger towards the church rather than ‘the king’s evil advisers’.
LikeLike
Some of the things that happened do look like people settling old scores.
LikeLike
Very interesting. —- Suzanne
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Opus Anglicanum by Tanya Bentham – A Review | A Writer's Perspective