Medieval Officers of the Law


Over the last few weeks we’ve looked at the various courts of fourteenth-century England. Today it’s the turn of the officials who ran the courts.

I’ve already written about the person who managed the manorial court. This was the manor’s reeve.

At the county, or shire, level the sheriff was responsible for the court, which was held once a month or so. He was the chief officer in a shire, or the shire reeve. The sheriff represented the crown and investigated crimes in his jurisdiction. He could also try minor offences. When someone was accused of a serious crime, he had to detain them until a judge visited the county. Sheriffs collected revenue, fines, and rents. They also executed writs, put together juries, guarded prisoners and presided over the county court. It was also the sheriff’s job to investigate things other than crimes and report back to the king.  They had military as well as legal responsibilities. They gathered men to fight in the king’s wars and kept them fed.

It won’t surprise you to learn that sheriffs could be bribed. They had great power and any threat they made to extort money could probably be carried out with impunity. Despite it being illegal, it wasn’t unknown for them to torture prisoners, and they could make money by threatening well-off prisoners with torture. Should someone escape from one of his prisons or if he caught someone committing a crime, the sheriff could behead them then and there, provided the coroner was present. He was a man greatly to be feared.

The bailiff was the chief officer of a hundred. He was subsidiary to the sheriff and he also represented the crown. Of the 628 hundreds in England, 358 were in the hands of lords of the manor. Usually they allowed sheriffs access to their courts, but they didn’t have to, and some of them did not. Many of these lords had the right to appoint coroners and hang criminals without reference to the sheriff.

Judges travelled out to local courts. This was supposed to be a way of decreasing corruption. As we saw in the post about outlaws, local courts could be swayed by fear and bribery. Since the judges, their wealth and their families were not located in the areas where they were administering justice, they were supposed to be ‘untouchable’. As we saw in the case of Sir Richard Willoughby, this was not necessarily the case.

The coroner was another court official. One of his duties was to make sure that goods and chattels belonging to an executed man or any fines taken in the hundred and county courts went to the king, and not to anyone else. Coroners held inquests on dead bodies. Much as today, it was their job to find out whether the person had been murdered, committed suicide, died naturally or by accident. They heard appeals and the confessions of outlaws. They recorded and reported burglaries, arson and homicides to the royal justices.

A town was a division of a hundred. It was usually part of a manor. The town constable was responsible for making the bailiff aware of crimes and bringing cases to the hundred court. The constable watched suspicious people and organised the pursuit of wrong-doers when the hue and cry was raised. This was a loud noise telling the people of a town or village that a burglary or murder had been committed. Everyone who heard it was supposed to leave what they were doing to view the scene of the crime and to pursue the criminal.

The chief tithing-man had to report to the manorial court or the constable, depending on where the tithing was.

In 1361 the position of justice of the peace was created. This was a local lord of the manor who held quarter sessions. The trials were before juries and the justices had the ability to give the death penalty. They gradually replaced sheriffs and hundred courts. Justices of the peace could punish rioters and people who broke the peace. They could arrest and imprison them or hold their goods and money against their continued good behaviour in the future. They could try people for certain crimes. The powers of the justices of the peace increased over the rest of the century. One of their later powers included supervising laws preventing workers from overcharging for their labour, which was a common occurrence after the Black Death.



A Dictionary of Medieval Terms and Phrases – Christopher Corèdon and Ann Williams

The Time Traveller’s Guide to Medieval England – Ian Mortimer

England in the reign of Edward III – Scott L. Waugh



Filed under Fourteenth Century, Medieval Crime and Law

28 responses to “Medieval Officers of the Law

  1. rachaelstray

    So interesting to look back on history like this and see hopefully how far we’ve come. Interesting that we still have JPs now and their role has evolved but is clearly still based on the original premise in many ways.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Great and comprehensive series April. As a eader of historical fiction I will be looking back on these posts… and those sheriffs!No wonder the Sheriff of Nottingham was a baddie.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Great info and research April.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. This is such an interesting series April. It was fascinating to read of market forces coming into play after the Black Death, with workers hiking up their wages.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Loved this…so interesting thank you! Will be passing this link onto my Dad too who loves medieval stuff too!

    Liked by 1 person

  6. annasmumndad

    Enjoyed reading this April,interesting how the seeds were being sown of our legal system. The novels of Michael Jecks are also a good read about this medieval legal world.
    Butterflys Dad.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thank you. I’ve not come across Michael Jecks before, but I’ll have a look at him.

      I think it’s interesting that there was such a major change after the Black Death, when people started to worry a lot more about crime in general.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. lydiaschoch

    It’s interesting to me to see how much of the medieval justice system has influenced our current justice systems in western countries. There are differences, of course, but I think someone who lived back then would see many similarities as well.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. The early coroners’ inquests fascinate me. Without having a body examined by someone with medical experience, it must have been very difficult to tell if, for example, a fatal injury was caused by a fall or a blow. Could medieval coroners request a medical opinion?

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Shaunn Munn

    Having enjoyed reading the Ellis Peters’ sleuth novels about Brother Cadfael, I found your series about medieval law extremely interesting! Going to have to ask Sis to borrow those books again. I think I’ll understand the background more!

    Your books — are they in print & where can they be found in the U.S.? I don’t do e-books. At my age I have to severely limit screen time to help my eyes. Since I enjoy what I read in this blog, your books must be fascinating! We have Barnes & Noble; could I order hard copies through them?

    Thank you! Love this! Wishing you joy and endless creativity!


  10. Gosh April, you’ve researched this aspect in detail. I will go to previous posts to catch up. Wondering how the sheriff was appointed?

    Liked by 2 people

  11. Pingback: The Medieval Bailiff | A Writer's Perspective

Please join the conversation

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s